Visual Assets
8 screenshotsStore Profile
Identity
- Publisher
- GARENA INTERNATIONAL I
- iOS app ID
- 1300146617
Market Signals
- US top grossing
- 32
- US top free
- 46
- Downloads
- 2.1B
- Rating
- 4.3
Loading lower dossier sections.

| platform identifier | com.dts.freefireth |
|---|---|
| Store title | Free Fire: Undersea Mystery |
| iOS app ID | 1300146617 |
| ios bundle id | com.dts.freefireth |
| ios title | Free Fire: Undersea Mystery |
| Publisher | GARENA INTERNATIONAL I |
| version | 1.123 |
| rating average | 4.3 |
| rating display | 4.3 |
| rating count | 128000000 |
| downloads bucket | 1B+ |
| store category | Action |
| content rating | Teen |
| paid | false |
| price | Free |
| updated on | 2026-04-01 |
| whats new | {"notes":["Undersea Realm adds underwater combat in Bermuda and the Hydro Blaster event weapon.","New character Ray can link to a target and reset skill on takedown.","CS Random Events, Pyro companion progression, and new Play Games Service achievements after updating to Version 1.123."],"version":"1.123"} |
| ios version | 1.123.1 |
| ios current version release date | 2026-04-08 |
| ios rating average | 3.98 |
| ios rating count | 342356 |
| ios price | 0 |
| ios size mb | 1398.8 |
| US top free | 46 |
| US top grossing | 32 |
| ios us top grossing rank | 16 |
| Download estimate | 2.1B |
Loading lower dossier sections.
No exact-game UA creatives found.
Free Fire’s core loop compresses battle royale into mobile-readable sessions: drop, loot, rotate under zone pressure, fight or avoid enemies, survive to a final confrontation, and return for rank, mastery, characters, weapons, and seasonal events.
Free Fire’s visible opportunity is fast mobile battle royale with strong seasonal spectacle; the hidden risk is assuming content themes and hero/weapon novelty matter before validating combat readability, session compression, and fairness perception.
Free Fire has clear depth potential from survival routing, combat timing, map pressure, equipment, and character systems, but seasonal content only adds depth if it changes readable decisions rather than adding spectacle.
15 of 15 responses include lens metadata.

This player responds to social proof and instant genre clarity, but mobile convenience and fairness concerns are significant.
I would download it if friends were already playing, because Free Fire looks instantly understandable as a jump-in shooter. The 1B+ downloads are hard to ignore, and the action images make it seem like something people would already know how to talk about. I am less sure it fits a casual waiting-around session, since battle royale usually wants both hands and focus. I would try it once for the social pull, but if the free-to-play side feels pay-to-win or the controls are awkward on the go, I would delete it quickly.
This player responds to social proof and instant genre clarity, but mobile convenience and fairness concerns are significant.I like that the game looks recognizable, social, and easy to explain to friends.
I am concerned it may not be comfortable for quick casual play and may pressure spending.
The store visuals show a bold action shooter with character-forward combat energy.
I would probably download it only if I had time for a real match, not as a quick break game. The 1B+ downloads make it feel like there will always be people playing, and the store art makes the action look immediate. What worries me is whether a battle royale match takes too long or needs too much attention when I am just waiting somewhere. The visuals look readable enough in the store images, but if the first session has lots of pop-ups or tiny menus, I would bounce.
This player sees strong popularity and action appeal, but the session length and interruption fit are uncertain.I like that the game looks active and recognizable, with a huge player base behind it.
I do not like the chance that matches and menus may be too demanding for short gaps.
The landscape action images make it look energetic, but not especially calm or pause-friendly.
I would be curious enough to try Free Fire, but it does look more like a giant mainstream shooter than something with a weird new hook. The bright character art and event-style presentation give it energy, and the massive download number tells me there is a real community there. My hesitation is that it may be built around constant passes, logins, and cosmetic pressure instead of surprising gameplay. I would install it for a night with friends, but I would not expect it to feel personal or fresh unless the modes are more creative than the store makes them look.
This player is open because of community scale and visual energy, while originality and event pressure hold the score back.I like the bright action style and the sense that many people are already playing.
I worry it may feel like a familiar shooter wrapped in constant event pressure.
The store art looks flashy and character-heavy, with a strong live-game feel.
I might install Free Fire to look at the outfits and character style, but it is not an obvious cozy pick for me. The store art has a lot of dramatic poses, weapons, and bright action, so it seems more about intensity than relaxing collection. I do like games where I can make my character look cool, and a huge free-to-play shooter probably has plenty of cosmetics. My worry is that the menus and purchases could feel cluttered or pushy, so I would only keep it if customization feels fun without making me feel behind.
This player finds some cosmetic appeal, but the combat-heavy tone and possible purchase pressure reduce intent.I like the possibility of expressive character looks and cosmetic collecting.
I worry the action pace and free-to-play pressure may feel too harsh for casual comfort.
The visuals look bright and packed with characters, weapons, and dramatic action.
I would install Free Fire to see if the fights still feel sharp, mostly because a battle royale with that many downloads probably has real competition. The action art makes it look fast and crowded, which is good if the controls are tight and winning actually takes skill. My worry is that a big free-to-play shooter can lean too hard on paid cosmetics or upgrades, and the top-grossing placement makes me watch for that. The store images look built around characters, weapons, and quick chaos, so I would try a few matches but uninstall fast if the menus or purchases get in the way.
This player is drawn by competitive scale and action clarity, but value and fairness concerns limit confidence.I like that it looks active, competitive, and easy to understand as a battle royale.
I am wary that the free-to-play setup may push purchases into the competitive side.
The character and weapon-focused store art makes the game look loud, fast, and match-driven.

This player sees production quality but rejects the reflex-heavy feel and unclear long-term value.
I would probably skip Free Fire, even though I do like games where planning matters. From the store images, it looks more like fast aiming and movement than gentle strategy, and I would not want to learn a lot of on-screen controls just to keep up. I notice the popularity and the polished action art, which tells me it is not a low-effort game. My concern is that it is free-to-play instead of a clear pay-once purchase, so I would not feel confident about the value before installing.
This player sees production quality but rejects the reflex-heavy feel and unclear long-term value.I like that it appears polished and may include some tactical choices.
I dislike the fast controls and the lack of a simple pay-once value promise.
The visuals look intense and action-focused, with little sign of gentle planning.
I would not install Free Fire because it looks uncomfortable for the way I like to play on a tablet. The landscape action images suggest I would need both hands, quick reactions, and a lot of attention, which is not what I want when relaxing at home. The game clearly has strong polish and a huge audience, so I do not doubt that it works for other players. I would still worry about small buttons, constant motion, and whether the free-to-play parts make the experience feel unsettled.
This player prioritizes comfort, readability, and relaxed tablet use, which conflicts with the visible action format.I like that it looks polished and widely supported.
I dislike that it seems fast, crowded, and not very comfortable for tablet play.
The visuals look like a landscape combat game that needs a firm two-handed grip.
I would skip Free Fire because it does not look like a peaceful game I would want to pay to keep ad-free. The store images make it look like a serious landscape shooter with lots of motion and competition, and that is more pressure than I want. I do notice the enormous download number, so I assume it is a real, established game. Still, I would be concerned about free-to-play prompts, unclear offers, and needing to play in a tense two-handed way.
This player values trust and peaceful value, while the action format and spending ambiguity strongly reduce intent.I like that it seems established and widely played.
I dislike the chance of pressure, unclear offers, and tense play.
The store visuals look like a full-screen action shooter rather than a calm game to sit with.
I would not download Free Fire because it looks too active for a simple daily routine. The store art is polished, but it shows combat and movement instead of clear levels, hints, or a calm objective. I might understand the appeal for someone passing time with a quick match, especially with so many downloads behind it. For me, on-screen movement controls and a busy shooter screen would probably make it more stressful than enjoyable.
This player needs calm repetition and clear objectives, while Free Fire appears too fast and control-heavy.I like that the game looks polished and well established.
I dislike that it does not seem calm, clear, or easy to settle into daily.
The visuals show action and movement rather than quiet goals or readable puzzle progress.
I would not download Free Fire for myself because it looks too fast and complicated. The store art shows a lot of action, weapons, and movement, and I do not immediately see simple rules like I would in a card or puzzle game. I understand why a game with 1B+ downloads might be popular, but popularity does not make it comfortable for me. I would worry about on-screen controls, small icons, and whether purchases affect the game too much.
This player prefers familiar rules and readable layouts, and the shooter presentation creates too much friction.I can see that many people enjoy it and that it has a large audience.
I dislike that it looks fast, crowded, and possibly affected by purchases.
The visuals look busy with combat scenes and do not show the simple layout I prefer.

This player recognizes polish and decision-making appeal, but the genre tone clashes with calm daily play needs.
I would probably not download Free Fire as part of my usual game routine. The store images look exciting, and I can tell from the huge download count that it has staying power, but it does not look calm or puzzle-like enough for how I normally play. I do appreciate games where better decisions matter, so I can see why someone would enjoy outsmarting other players. For me, the action-heavy visuals and likely tap-and-swipe pressure make it feel more stressful than relaxing.
This player recognizes polish and decision-making appeal, but the genre tone clashes with calm daily play needs.I like that it appears polished and may reward smart decisions.
I dislike that it looks intense, fast, and outside my relaxing daily routine.
The visuals read as bright combat action rather than a calm problem-solving space.
I would be cautious about installing Free Fire, even though it clearly has polish and a very large audience. The action presentation looks professional, and I can see the appeal if the matches reward smart positioning and quick decisions. What gives me pause is the free-to-play setup and top-grossing status, because I do not want a game that keeps nudging me toward passes or daily chores. I might try it once, but I would only stay if spending feels optional and the controls work well in short sessions.
This player notices polish and tactical potential, while purchase trust and time respect are the main barriers.I like that it looks polished, popular, and potentially strategic in short bursts.
I dislike the possibility of battle-pass pressure and routine spending prompts.
The store art gives a polished combat-first impression with a busy live-game feel.
I would probably skip Free Fire for myself because it looks like it needs too much attention at once. The store images show a fast shooter with weapons, squads, and a lot happening on screen, which can be exciting but not very interruption-friendly. I can see the appeal of outsmarting people in a match, and the huge download number suggests it is a reliable game. For my schedule, though, I would rather have something with clearer pause points and less chance of subscriptions, currencies, or small text getting in the way.
This player values reliability and some competitive thought, but fast action and uncertain interruption fit lower intent.I like that the game appears established and may offer smart competitive moments.
I dislike that it looks hard to pause and potentially crowded with purchases or small controls.
The visuals look energetic and crowded, more like a full-focus match than a quick break.
I would consider downloading Free Fire if I had friends or family members who wanted to compare matches. The store art makes it look energetic and social, and the 1B+ downloads tell me the competition pool will not be empty. I am not looking for a calm game here, but I could enjoy the bragging-rights side if the matchmaking is fair. My concern is that a free shooter this big may come with lots of event noise, so I would need clean menus and clear goals to stick with it.
This player is motivated by fair comparison and social play, with clarity and event clutter as the deciding issues.I like the chance for active competition and easy comparison with other players.
I worry that too many events and prompts could make it feel noisy instead of fun.
The visuals look like a lively action game with strong character and squad energy.
I would try Free Fire, but I would go in looking for whether there is more to it than running and shooting. The store presentation shows a polished combat game with character style and gear, which could be interesting if choices around loadouts and positioning matter. I like upgrade paths when they are readable and not buried under five different currencies. My concern is that the game may expect daily logins and long sessions, so I would only keep it if the strategy is clear and the mobile controls do not fight me.
This player sees possible tactical depth and style choices, but needs readable systems and restrained live-game pressure.I like the possibility of meaningful loadout, positioning, and upgrade choices.
I dislike the risk of too many currencies, daily tasks, or awkward controls.
The action images look polished and gear-focused, with a lot competing for attention.