Visual Assets
8 screenshotsStore Profile
Identity
- Publisher
- Moon Active LTD
- iOS app ID
- 6745761596
Market Signals
- US top grossing
- 45
- US top free
- 24
Loading lower dossier sections.

| iOS app ID | 6745761596 |
|---|---|
| ios bundle id | com.moonactive.cmboard |
| ios title | Coin Master - Board Adventure |
| Publisher | Moon Active LTD |
| downloads bucket | 5M+ |
| store category | Board |
| content rating | 17+ |
| ios version | 3.5.2540 |
| ios current version release date | 2026-05-26 |
| ios rating average | 4.89 |
| ios rating count | 26455 |
| ios price | 0 |
| ios size mb | 353.7 |
| US top free | 24 |
| US top grossing | 45 |
| ios us top free rank | 87 |
| ios us top grossing rank | 75 |
Loading lower dossier sections.
No exact-game UA creatives found.
A dice-board progression loop where players roll, move around a reward track, collect currencies or events, spend progress, and chase the next board milestone.
The riskiest hidden assumption is that dice-board rewards provide enough agency; the first prototypes should test whether pre-roll choices, milestone clarity, and reward pacing prevent the game from feeling passive.
Coin Master - Board Adventure has strong reward-loop breadth but uncertain game depth; dice-board outcomes, currencies, chests, maps, and events create constant state changes, yet player agency may be thin.
15 of 15 responses include lens metadata.

This sample is interested in light strategy and readable progress, with concern that the loop may be too shallow.
I would give this a cautious try because board progress and upgrades can be satisfying when the choices matter. The store images make it look very readable for one-handed play, and I like that I can probably understand the loop without a long tutorial. What worries me is whether there is any real planning or if it is mostly tapping through rewards. I would stay if the game has meaningful upgrade decisions, but I would leave if it is all flash and little control.
This sample is interested in light strategy and readable progress, with concern that the loop may be too shallow.I like that the board and upgrades look easy to follow in short sessions.
I worry the game may not offer enough meaningful decisions.
The layout looks suitable for quick one-handed play without much control complexity.
I would probably try it, but only as a game I can pause and ignore when family or work interrupts me. The bright board and building-style progress look pleasant, and I like games where I can see something improve over time. The concern is that a flashy free-to-play game can easily become a grind with timers, events, or spending nudges. If it lets me make satisfying progress in five minutes without punishing me for leaving, I would keep it around.
This sample sees a good family-life fit if sessions are pause-friendly and progression remains low pressure.I like the cheerful sense of building progress over time.
I worry that events, timers, or purchases could make it feel like another obligation.
The bright scenes look lively and easy to read, even if they are a bit busy.
I would not rush to download this unless I could see clear value beyond the free install. It looks polished and trustworthy enough to sample, and the colorful upgrade screens suggest a pleasant casual loop. Still, I am cautious with games built around coins and rewards because the spending can get murky fast. I would rather pay once for a clean experience than deal with constant offers, so this would need to prove it is restrained.
This sample can spend when value is clear, but the visible reward economy creates trust and purchase clarity concerns.I like that the presentation looks polished enough to try once.
I worry that coins, rewards, and offers could make the value hard to judge.
The colorful upgrade screens look professional, but also very purchase-friendly.
I would download it if I wanted something casual to compare progress with friends or family. The board adventure setup looks simple enough for short sessions, and a big established player base makes me think there would be events or social momentum. The store images are colorful without looking too hard to control, which helps. I would not care about playing across PC and mobile here, but I would care that any competition stays fair and does not just reward whoever spends most.
This sample is drawn to friendly comparison and short-session progress, while fairness matters more than platform flexibility.I like that it looks popular and easy to use for light comparison with others.
I worry that competition could become more about spending than playing.
The colorful board scenes make the game look approachable for quick sessions.
I would try this as a light routine game, mainly because it looks easy to understand and not like a fast action game. The board layout and reward path suggest I could make a bit of progress while relaxing, which is what I want from mobile play. The high rating and large download number make it feel less risky to install. My hesitation is the free-to-play model, because I do not want progress to slow down unless I spend.
This sample values calm routine and clear progress, with spending concerns centered on whether free play remains fair.I like that it looks relaxed, readable, and popular enough to trust for a first try.
I worry that the free-to-play economy could make progress feel unfair.
The board layout looks much easier to follow than a crowded action screen.

This sample is intrigued by colorful world-building but skeptical because the visible hook feels more familiar than distinctive.
I would be curious enough to look, but I am not sure I would keep it installed because it feels very familiar. The board adventure idea could be fun if there are weird islands, clever upgrades, or surprising events, but the store images mostly sell bright rewards and polished progression. I like that the world looks cheerful and easy to read. I would skip any subscription-style pressure, because this needs a stronger personality before I would commit.
This sample is intrigued by colorful world-building but skeptical because the visible hook feels more familiar than distinctive.I like the cheerful world and the possibility of discovering new board areas.
I worry it may feel too close to familiar free-to-play reward loops without a fresh idea.
The bright graphics pop, but the store presentation does not show much originality.
I would download this if I wanted something simple for short breaks, because the board path and reward screens make the next action look pretty obvious. It seems easy to pick up, tap through a few turns, and put away without needing a long session. The colorful scenes are clear, but I would want the interface to stay calm and not keep throwing pop-ups at me. I am fine watching the occasional ad for an extra chance, but not if that becomes the main rhythm.
This sample sees a good short-session fit, with retention depending on fast clarity, readable progress, and restrained interruptions.I like that it looks simple enough for a few quick turns during a break.
I worry that ads or pop-ups could break the short-session flow.
The board path and bright rewards make the next move look easy to understand.
I would not be in a rush to download this because it looks more reward-driven than skill-driven. The board and coin systems might be satisfying for chasing upgrades, but I do not see much that tells me winning would feel earned. The clean, bright menus help me understand the loop quickly, which is a plus. My worry is that progress could come down to spending, luck, or waiting instead of smart play.
This sample values depth and fairness, so the polished reward loop is only mildly appealing without stronger evidence of skillful decisions.I like that the loop looks readable and polished at a glance.
I worry the game may lean too much on luck, spending, and hype rewards instead of fair mastery.
The bright menus look clean enough to follow, but they do not show much competitive depth.
I would download this for a low-effort evening game, mostly because the board path and colorful rewards look easy to settle into without learning a lot. It seems like the kind of thing I could open while chatting with friends and still make progress. The bright villages and reward-heavy screens make it feel cozy enough, but I would get annoyed if every comeback depends on ads or spending. I like the familiar Coin Master energy, though I would only stay if the game lets me collect and build without constant pressure.
This sample is attracted to relaxed collection and social-adjacent progress, but the free-to-play reward economy creates concern about pressure and interruptions.I like that it looks colorful, collectible, and easy to come back to after a long day.
I worry that rewards and revives could turn into too much ad watching or spending pressure.
The board scenes and bright reward moments make the game look friendly rather than demanding.
I would probably install it for a quick test because the name already has social proof and the board setup looks obvious from the store images. It seems like something I could understand in a minute while waiting around, which matters more to me than deep strategy here. The colorful landscape-style screens look polished, but they also feel a little familiar rather than fresh. I would skip paying for anything recurring unless the game proves it has more than just another reward loop.
This sample responds to recognizable social proof and fast clarity, while questioning novelty and any ongoing payment expectation.I like that the game looks easy to explain and quick to start.
I worry it may feel too familiar and not worth any recurring payment.
The wide colorful board images look polished, but not especially surprising.

This sample prioritizes trust and ad-free comfort, making the reward economy and uncertain payment structure a major barrier.
I would probably skip it at first because I am careful with free games that may rely on repeated purchases or subscriptions. The game looks polished and popular, so I would not assume it is low quality. But the coin-heavy reward style makes me wonder how peaceful it would actually be after the first few minutes. I would rather have a clear ad-free purchase and straightforward rules before I install.
This sample prioritizes trust and ad-free comfort, making the reward economy and uncertain payment structure a major barrier.I like that the game appears polished and widely played.
I worry it may ask for too much money, attention, or ad tolerance.
The polished coin and reward visuals make the game look busy rather than peaceful.
I would consider downloading this because a board-style game is familiar to me and easier to approach than many mobile games. The colorful path and clear reward spaces make it look like I could understand what to do without a long explanation. I am less interested in chasing prizes just for the sake of it, and I would not want to watch many ads to keep going. If the rules are simple and the menus stay clean, I could see it being a pleasant short habit.
This sample responds to familiar board structure and readable objectives, with ad pressure and reward chasing as the main concerns.I like that the board format feels familiar and easy to understand.
I worry that ads or constant prize chasing could get in the way of simple play.
The path and reward spaces look clear enough to follow at a glance.
I would maybe try it, but it does not look as calm as the daily puzzle games I usually enjoy. The board path seems familiar enough, and I like that the goals appear to be shown visually rather than hidden behind complicated rules. Still, the coin rewards and free-to-play setup make me worry about ads or interruptions. I would keep it only if I can play one short session a day without being rushed or pestered.
This sample sees familiar routine potential, but ad pressure and noisy reward pacing are likely churn risks.I like that the board path looks familiar and visually easy to understand.
I worry that ads and reward prompts could make it feel less peaceful.
The visuals are colorful and readable, but not as calm as a puzzle screen.
I would probably try this only if it stays simple and does not push me into too many social features. A board game with light planning could be pleasant, and the path-style layout looks easier to follow than a fast action game. I am cautious about anything that asks for ongoing payments or keeps nudging me to join events. If I can play quietly, make a few choices, and stop whenever I want, it could work for me.
This sample finds familiar board progression approachable, but social pressure and ongoing payment expectations reduce confidence.I like that the board path looks calmer and easier to follow than action play.
I worry about social pressure, subscriptions, or too many prompts.
The board layout appears readable enough for gentle planning.
I would be hesitant to download it because the store images look lively but also a little crowded for relaxed tablet play. I do like games that let me improve over time, and a board adventure could be easy to return to each day. The problem is that I prefer clear, calm screens, and this looks like it may have a lot of rewards, coins, and buttons competing for attention. I would be more interested if there were a simple paid version with fewer interruptions.
This sample values comfort and readability, so the progress loop appeals but the busy presentation and free-to-play structure create friction.I like the idea of steady progress I can return to each day.
I worry the screens may feel crowded and interrupted by too many rewards or offers.
The bright images look fun, but there seems to be a lot happening on the screen.