Visual Assets
8 screenshotsStore Profile
Identity
- Publisher
- Guru Future Holding Limited
- iOS app ID
- 6744049261
Market Signals
- US top free
- 79
Loading lower dossier sections.

| iOS app ID | 6744049261 |
|---|---|
| ios bundle id | block.color.game.jam.blocks.sort.puzzle.games.slide.free |
| ios title | Block Color Mania, Puzzle Game |
| Publisher | Guru Future Holding Limited |
| downloads bucket | 1M+ |
| store category | Puzzle |
| content rating | 4+ |
| ios version | 2.7.0 |
| ios current version release date | 2026-03-30 |
| ios rating average | 4.91 |
| ios rating count | 13955 |
| ios price | 0 |
| ios size mb | 266.3 |
| US top free | 79 |
Loading lower dossier sections.
No exact-game UA creatives found.
A sliding block color-sort loop: move colored block groups through directional exits or matching lanes, unlock constrained spaces, clear targets, and tackle a denser next layout.
This block-sort puzzle has clear visual appeal and strong top-free signal, but its biggest hidden risk is rule stack opacity: color exits, sliding constraints, locks, keys, numbered blockers, and boosters may create either elegant sequencing or unreadable trial-and-error.
Block Color Mania has strong potential for real depth because movement constraints, color exits, locks, keys, and blockers can form meaningful dependency puzzles, but it is also the most exposed to rule-stack opacity and booster-driven compression.
15 of 15 responses include lens metadata.

This sample sees some short-session appeal but limited evidence of social or competitive hooks. Popularity and clear boards support a trial, while lack of visible goals limits retention confidence.
I might download it for a quick puzzle challenge, but I would not expect much social competition from what is shown. The game looks popular and the boards are bright enough that I could compare progress casually with someone, but I do not see leagues, events, or friend goals. I like that it seems easy to pick up while waiting somewhere, and the landscape-style images make the play area look spacious. I would keep it only if the levels feel fair and there are clear goals beyond endless boards.
This sample sees some short-session appeal but limited evidence of social or competitive hooks. Popularity and clear boards support a trial, while lack of visible goals limits retention confidence.I like that it looks quick to start and easy to compare progress casually.
I do not see enough social goals or competition to keep me coming back.
The wide, colorful board makes the play area look open and readable.
I would download it if I needed a simple puzzle I can stop at any moment. The colored blocks and clear board make it look like I would not need much instruction, which matters when I am playing between family or work interruptions. I am cautious about free-to-play puzzle games, though, because I do not want boosters or payments to decide whether I can keep progressing. If it stays fair and lets me finish a level in a few minutes, it would fit my schedule well.
This sample is a good fit for quick, interruptible puzzle sessions. The main risk is whether monetization affects fair progress or adds pressure.I like that it appears easy to pause and understand quickly.
I worry purchases or boosters could become too important for progress.
The colorful puzzle board looks simple enough to read without much instruction.
I would download this for my puzzle routine if the levels are calm and not overloaded with prompts. It looks familiar in a good way, with simple colored blocks and a clean enough board to understand without reading a long tutorial. I like having something I can open for a few minutes and feel like I finished a small challenge. My only concern is ad frequency, because one ad after every quick level would ruin the relaxing part.
This sample fits the familiar, readable puzzle loop well and values calm daily play. Monetization uncertainty prevents a stronger score.I like the familiar puzzle format and the promise of quick, calm progress.
I dislike the risk that ads could break the quiet routine.
The simple block boards look uncluttered and easy to follow.
I would be mildly interested, but I am not sure I would install it unless the puzzles have more planning than the store page shows. The colored block layout looks easy to control, and I can see how the sorting could become satisfying. What I do not see is a deeper system, upgrades, or meaningful choices that would keep me engaged beyond passing time. If it is just a steady stream of boards with ads between them, I would lose interest.
This sample is less motivated by a simple casual loop and needs evidence of meaningful decisions. Clean controls help, but the visible offer appears more like a time filler than a strategy habit.I like that the block movement looks simple and readable.
I do not see enough planning depth to make it a regular game for me.
The board looks easy to tap and swipe through, but the larger system is unclear.
I would consider downloading it, but I would check quickly whether there is a clean ad-free option. The game looks like a simple puzzle I could play in short pockets of time, and the high rating makes it seem reasonably polished. The store images show a clear board with colorful pieces, which is good for a phone game I may play one-handed or in landscape. My hesitation is that free puzzle games often interrupt too much, and I would rather pay a small amount than sit through constant ads.
This sample has moderate-to-high install intent because the game appears readable and time-friendly. Willingness to spend depends on whether monetization feels straightforward and respectful.I like that it seems polished enough for short puzzle sessions.
I worry the free version may rely too much on interruptions instead of fair value.
The colorful board looks clear enough to play comfortably on a phone.

This sample is a strong fit for familiar daily puzzle play and readable boards. Ad frequency is the primary uncertainty affecting long-term intent.
I would download it for a trial because it looks like a straightforward daily puzzle. The colored blocks are large and the board seems easy to read, so I would expect to learn the rules without much trouble. I like games that let me solve a few levels calmly and then come back the next day. My main worry is that ads might appear too often, because that would make a relaxing routine feel annoying.
This sample is a strong fit for familiar daily puzzle play and readable boards. Ad frequency is the primary uncertainty affecting long-term intent.I like that it seems suitable for calm daily puzzle solving.
I worry repeated ads could spoil the routine.
The large colored blocks look easy to read and not too busy.
I would consider downloading it on a tablet because the board looks roomy and the colored pieces seem easy to see. I like that it appears simple enough to play while sitting at home without fast reflexes or tiny controls. I am less interested in chasing constant new content, so it would need to feel pleasant and steady rather than pushy. If the ads are mild and the touch targets are comfortable, this could be a nice occasional puzzle.
This sample responds to the roomy, readable board and likely low-reflex play. Install intent is positive but conditional on comfort, pacing, and low-pressure monetization.I like that it looks comfortable for relaxed play on a larger screen.
I would dislike it if it pushed constant offers or small controls.
The board appears roomy, with colored pieces that should be easy to see.
I would probably try it because it looks like a familiar tile-style puzzle with clear rules. The board is colorful but not hard to understand, and I like games where I can see the whole problem in front of me. I would want helpful undo or hints if the levels get tricky, because guessing and restarting over and over is not enjoyable. My biggest concern is clutter from ads or extra menus, since a simple puzzle should stay simple.
This sample has solid trial intent because the puzzle resembles familiar board or tile play with visible clarity. Retention depends on support features and keeping ads or menus from cluttering the experience.I like that the board looks familiar and easy to follow.
I worry ads, extra menus, or lack of help could make it frustrating.
The colorful tile-like layout looks understandable at a glance.
I might download it, but only if I can remove ads or they are not too frequent. The puzzle itself looks calm and understandable, with colored blocks on a clear board, which is the kind of thing I could play while relaxing. I am wary of free games that keep interrupting or pushing offers, especially when I just want a quiet puzzle. If the rules are explained simply and the payments are not pushy, I could enjoy it.
This sample is attracted to a calm, readable puzzle but cautious about ad-heavy free play. A clear ad-free option would likely improve intent.I like that the puzzle looks calm and easy to understand.
I worry the free version may interrupt too often or push offers.
The colored board looks clear, though I would want the menus to stay simple too.
I would probably pass unless I learned the puzzles involve some gentle planning. The store pictures make the basic play look clear, but I do not see much of a theme, story, or set of choices to settle into. I like slower puzzle games when each move matters and I can think at my own pace. This might be pleasant for a short while, but it looks more like simple sorting than the light strategy I usually enjoy.
This sample needs gentle strategic choices and a sense of meaningful planning. The game appears readable but too simple from the available store evidence.I like that the play area looks clear and not frantic.
I do not see enough gentle strategy or meaningful choices to interest me.
The board looks easy to view, but the overall game seems plain.

This sample values originality and is not strongly pulled by a familiar block-sorting presentation. Clarity and popularity help, but the lack of visible novelty limits download intent.
I would probably not download it right away because it looks polished but not very surprising. I like puzzle games where the hook feels clever, and this mostly reads as another color block sorter with a big audience. The landscape board images do make the play space look clear and easy to handle, which helps. Still, unless the levels introduce a twist or some satisfying progression, I would expect to play for ten minutes and move on.
This sample values originality and is not strongly pulled by a familiar block-sorting presentation. Clarity and popularity help, but the lack of visible novelty limits download intent.I like that the puzzle layout looks clear and easy to grasp.
I worry it will feel like a familiar clone without a memorable twist.
The wide board view looks usable, but it does not show much personality.
I would download this as a commute game because it looks like I could understand a level in seconds. The puzzle grid and big colored pieces seem readable enough for short breaks, and I do like games where I can beat a few levels without settling in. My concern is the free-to-play setup, because if I have to watch ads just to recover from mistakes, it stops being a quick snack. I would keep it only if levels restart fast and the challenge ramps without nagging me.
This sample values quick starts, readable boards, and short-session flow. Install intent is positive but depends heavily on whether ad recovery and retries stay unobtrusive.I like that it appears fast to start and simple enough for short breaks.
I dislike the possibility that ads could interrupt the quick puzzle rhythm.
The large colored shapes make the board look easy to scan on a phone.
I would only maybe download this, and mostly out of curiosity about whether the puzzles have any real skill curve. It looks clean and easy to read, but from the store images I do not see competition, rankings, or a mastery hook beyond solving more boards. For a casual idle-ish time killer that is fine, but I usually need the win to feel earned instead of just fed to me between ads. If the later levels actually punish sloppy moves fairly, I could keep it around.
This sample has lower intent because the listing suggests approachable casual puzzles more than competitive mastery. Readability helps, but limited visible depth and ad concerns hold the score down.I like that the game looks clean and probably easy to control.
I worry the loop may be shallow and too dependent on ad-supported retries.
The board presentation looks readable, but it does not show much competitive intensity.
I would probably skip it unless I just wanted a very simple unwind game. The colors are pleasant and the boards look tidy, but I do not see much cozy collecting, decorating, or a reason to come back beyond clearing more puzzles. Free-to-play puzzle games can be fine, but spammy ads would ruin the calm part for me. I might try it for a night if it feels gentle, then delete it if it turns into pop-ups and level pressure.
This sample is cautious because the game fits light relaxation but lacks visible collection, customization, or social warmth. Ad risk weighs strongly against a cozy repeat habit.I like that the color-block style looks calm and easy on the eyes.
I do not see enough cozy progress or personalization to make me want to return daily.
The boards look orderly, but the store presentation feels more functional than comforting.
I would probably download it for a quick try, but I would not expect it to become my main game. The block-sorting idea looks easy to understand right away, and the strong rating makes it feel less risky than a random puzzle clone. I like that the boards in the store images look bright and readable, but it also looks more like a simple time filler than something my friends would talk about. If the ads interrupt every level, I would uninstall pretty fast.
This sample is open to a fast, polished puzzle download but skeptical about novelty, social pull, and ad pressure. The clear board presentation and strong public traction support a moderate install intent.I like that it looks easy to understand immediately and has enough traction to seem trustworthy.
I worry it may feel too plain and ad-heavy once the first few puzzles are over.
The colorful block boards look clean enough to read at a glance.
No segment scores in this group yet.