Visual Assets
8 screenshotsStore Profile
Identity
- Publisher
- Guru Puzzle Game
- iOS app ID
- 1625097467
Market Signals
- US top free
- 66
- Downloads
- 55M
- Rating
- 4.89
Loading lower dossier sections.

| platform identifier | ball.sort.puzzle.color.sorting.bubble.games |
|---|---|
| Store title | Ball Sort Puzzle - Color Game |
| iOS app ID | 1625097467 |
| ios bundle id | ball.sort.puzzle.color.sorting.bubble.games |
| ios title | Ball Sort Puzzle - Color Game |
| Publisher | Guru Puzzle Game |
| version | 4.6.0 |
| rating average | 4.89 |
| rating display | 4.89 |
| rating count | 781136 |
| downloads bucket | 50M+ |
| store category | Puzzle |
| content rating | Everyone |
| paid | false |
| price | Free |
| updated on | 2026-04-17 |
| whats new | {"notes":[],"version":null} |
| contains ads | true |
| in app purchases | true |
| ios version | 4.9.0 |
| ios current version release date | 2026-06-01 |
| ios rating average | 4.83 |
| ios rating count | 143726 |
| ios price | 0 |
| ios size mb | 268.6 |
| US top free | 66 |
| Download estimate | 55M |
Loading lower dossier sections.
No exact-game UA creatives found.
Ball Sort Puzzle loops around moving top balls between tubes, consolidating matching colors, celebrating completed tubes, then advancing to harder layouts with more colors and hidden balls.
Ball Sort has a proven, highly legible sorting loop. The hidden uncertainty for a new version is not the base rules, but whether level generation, hidden information, helper monetization, and polish can create enough perceived fairness and freshness.
Ball Sort shows clear moderate depth from constrained move ordering, limited empty space, color grouping, and recovery from stuck states. Its main risks are rote generated levels, hidden balls that feel unfair, and helper tools that dominate the puzzle instead of supporting planning.
15 of 15 responses include lens metadata.

This player values daily mental challenge, readable rules, and fair progression, which the color-sort format appears to support.
I would download this because it looks like a clear daily puzzle I could play at my own pace. The color sorting seems simple to learn, but it could still give me a nice sense of getting better as the levels become harder. I would be cautious if progress depends on paying or watching too many ads, since I want the challenge to feel fair. The store images show big, distinct colors and simple boards, which makes me think I could play without straining to read tiny details.
This player values daily mental challenge, readable rules, and fair progression, which the color-sort format appears to support.I like that it seems easy to learn while still offering level progress.
I would be bothered if ads or payments block fair progress.
The big distinct colors make the puzzle look easy on the eyes.
I would consider downloading it for a quiet puzzle, but I am not sure it has enough planning for me long term. Moving colors into the right tubes looks like a gentle little strategy exercise, and I like that I can think through moves without pressure. The concern is that the store page makes it look more like a simple time-passer than a game with meaningful choices. The uncluttered board helps, but I would need later levels that reward patience rather than ads or hints doing the work.
This player is drawn to low-stress planning, but uncertain depth and ad-supported help may weaken long-term interest.I like that it appears to let me plan moves calmly.
I worry it may be too simple to stay interesting.
The board looks uncluttered and focused on the puzzle.
I would probably download it to try because the rules look easy to understand from the pictures alone. It reminds me of simple table puzzles where the board state matters more than speed, and that suits me. I am less interested if the game becomes too flashy or pushes me through pop-ups, but the basic color layout looks clear. I would keep it if the levels are fair, readable, and easy to pause.
This player favors familiar, rule-clear puzzles with readable layouts and calm pacing, making the game a likely trial with some concern about flash and interruptions.I like that the rules appear easy to follow from the board layout.
I would dislike flashy distractions or too many pop-ups.
The colorful board is bright, but the goal still looks clear.
I would likely download this for relaxed tablet play. The puzzle looks familiar enough to understand without a lot of instructions, and the bright colored balls seem large enough to tap comfortably. I would not be looking for competition here, just a quiet way to keep my mind busy. My only concern is whether the free version interrupts too much, because a calm puzzle loses appeal if menus or ads keep getting in the way.
This player values comfort, readability, and calm pacing, and the clear puzzle boards fit those needs with some interruption risk.I like that the pieces look large and the rules seem easy to grasp.
I would dislike too many interruptions around a calm puzzle.
The board looks bright and readable for tablet play.
I might download it, but only if I can keep the experience peaceful. The sorting puzzle looks easy to understand, and I like games where I can take my time without rushing. Because it is free-to-play, I would be watching closely for forced ads or unclear purchase prompts. The store images look clean and not overly busy, which helps me trust the basic game, but I would want an honest ad-free option if I played often.
This player is open to paying for peace and clarity, but trust depends on whether ads and purchases stay transparent.I like that the puzzle appears calm and easy to understand.
I am wary of forced ads or confusing payment prompts.
The images look clean enough that the game itself seems easy to follow.

This player is willing to pay for calm convenience, and the familiar puzzle format fits relaxation if ad pressure stays reasonable.
I would consider downloading it if there is a fair way to remove ads. The puzzle looks familiar and relaxing, which is exactly the kind of thing I might play with my brain half off in the evening. The store images make the layout look straightforward, with no clutter hiding the actual game. My hesitation is that free-to-play puzzle apps can become noisy, so I would want the spending option to be simple and not feel like a trap.
This player is willing to pay for calm convenience, and the familiar puzzle format fits relaxation if ad pressure stays reasonable.I like that it looks like a straightforward relaxing puzzle.
I would dislike pushy ads or unclear purchase prompts.
The layout looks uncluttered and focused on the puzzle board.
I would download this as a daily puzzle option if the levels are varied enough. It looks calm, readable, and easy to return to without remembering a lot of rules. I am not expecting social features here, and that is fine, but I would need steady new levels or small goals to keep it from becoming background noise. The store images show a clear color-sorting board, which makes me think the first session would be simple and low stress.
This player values calm routine, clarity, and level progression, making the game a good fit if variety sustains repeated play.I like that it looks calm enough for a daily puzzle habit.
I worry the levels could blur together without enough variety.
The color-sorting board looks clear and low stress.
I might install it, but I would go in expecting a light puzzle rather than a strategy game. Sorting colors can involve planning a few moves ahead, and that part appeals to me if the levels ramp up properly. What worries me is that the store images mostly show simple boards, so I cannot tell whether the decisions get meaningful or just repetitive. The presentation is clean, but I do not see social play or deeper systems that would make it a regular game for me.
This player sees some planning potential in sorting but is skeptical about depth and long-term decision value.I like the possibility of planning several moves ahead.
I worry the puzzles may not have enough meaningful decisions over time.
The store images look clean, but the boards seem fairly simple.
I would probably pass unless there are leaderboards or timed challenges that the store page is not showing me. The sorting itself looks clear, and I can appreciate a puzzle where better planning leads to cleaner wins. Still, I like having some fair comparison with friends or other players, and this looks more like a solo time-killer. The large colorful pieces are easy to read, which helps, but I do not see enough competitive pull to make me choose it over other games.
This player values fair competition and comparison, while the available evidence points to solo puzzle play with limited social motivation.I like that successful sorting could reward planning and clean solutions.
I do not see the competitive goals or friend comparison I usually enjoy.
The big colored pieces look easy to read on the board.
I would download this if I wanted something simple to play between family and work interruptions. It looks easy to pause, and the objective seems clear enough that I would not need a long tutorial. The bright colors are a little flashy, but the boards look readable and not too crowded. I would be cautious about the free-to-play ads, because I do not want a quick puzzle break turning into a series of pop-ups.
This player needs low-friction sessions and clear goals, with monetization interruptions as the main risk.I like that the puzzle looks simple enough to resume after interruptions.
I am concerned that ads could make short sessions feel wasteful.
The colorful boards are bright but still easy to read.

This player prioritizes fast entry, one-handed readability, and low interruption, making the game a good short-session candidate with ad concerns.
I would download this for commuting or waiting rooms because it looks like I can start a level without thinking too hard. The goal is obvious from the store images, and the big colorful pieces seem readable on a phone. I am not looking for deep progression here, just something I can play one-handed and pause whenever. My main concern is ads, because a short-session game loses its point if every round gets interrupted.
This player prioritizes fast entry, one-handed readability, and low interruption, making the game a good short-session candidate with ad concerns.I like that each level looks easy to start and understand quickly.
I would be annoyed if ads break up short sessions too often.
The large colored balls and simple layout look comfortable for quick phone play.
I might download it when I want something calm, but it is not an automatic yes for me. The colorful balls and tidy layouts look relaxing, and I like puzzle games that let me zone out after a long day. What holds me back is that I do not see much personality, collecting, or customization to make it feel like my own little routine. The store page makes the levels look readable and soft enough, but the free-to-play setup makes me cautious about ads interrupting that cozy feeling.
This player responds to gentle visuals and low stress but wants comforting progression or expression, which the listing does not clearly show.I like the calm color sorting because it looks easy to settle into.
I do not see much customization or collection value to make me come back.
The large colored balls look readable and soothing enough for relaxed play.
I would download it if I needed a low-effort puzzle, mostly because it looks easy to explain in one second. The huge download number would make me trust that it is at least decent for casual play. I do not think my friends would talk about it much, though, because the store images look like a very standard color-sort game rather than something with a hook. If it has too many ads, I would uninstall fast, especially since this feels like the kind of game I would only open in short gaps.
This player is pulled by social proof and instant clarity, while the generic presentation and ad risk limit enthusiasm.I like that the game looks popular and very easy to understand.
I am not seeing a fresh hook that would make me tell friends about it.
The store images make the tap-and-sort action look simple and direct.
I would probably skip it unless I was really bored. The puzzle is clear, and I can see the appeal of cleaning up messy colors into order, but it looks like a familiar mobile template rather than a game with a weird or clever twist. The store art is polished enough, with bright tubes and neat level screens, yet it does not give me much personality to explore. I would rather spend time on a puzzle that surprises me or adds some unusual system after the first few levels.
This player seeks originality and personality, so the familiar color-sort format reduces download intent despite clear presentation.I like the basic satisfaction of organizing the colors.
I do not see enough originality to make this stand out from other puzzle apps.
The clean boards look polished, but the overall style feels very familiar.
I would probably download this as a quick filler game, but I would not expect it to hold me for long. The sorting idea looks instantly understandable, and that is good for a few minutes when I do not want a heavy game. My worry is that it may get repetitive fast unless later levels actually require planning instead of just tapping colors around. The store images show bright tubes and clean boards, so I can tell what I am doing right away, but I do not see much that looks competitive or skillful beyond beating my own level.
This player values quick clarity and earned challenge, so the simple sort loop is appealing for short use but weak on depth and competition.I like that I can understand the puzzle goal almost immediately.
I worry the loop may feel too light once the novelty wears off.
The bright tubes and simple boards make the game look easy to read at a glance.
No segment scores in this group yet.