Visual Assets
8 screenshotsStore Profile
Identity
- Publisher
- Scopely, Inc.
- iOS app ID
- 1541153375
Loading lower dossier sections.

| iOS app ID | 1541153375 |
|---|---|
| ios bundle id | com.kitkagames.fallbuddies |
| ios title | Stumble Guys |
| Publisher | Scopely, Inc. |
| downloads bucket | 100M+ |
| store category | Action |
| content rating | 9+ |
| ios version | 0.99 |
| ios current version release date | 2026-06-01 |
| ios rating average | 4.41 |
| ios rating count | 475777 |
| ios price | 0 |
| ios size mb | 1502.2 |
Loading lower dossier sections.
No exact-game UA creatives found.
Stumble Guys' core loop is a fast elimination party-platformer cycle: join a crowded obstacle round, survive or qualify through physics challenges, receive elimination/win feedback, collect progression or cosmetic rewards, and immediately try another run.
The critical uncertainty is agency under chaos: the game depends on funny failure and crowd physics, but replay motivation collapses if players perceive eliminations as random or unfair.
Stumble Guys has accessible moment-to-moment depth in movement, timing, hazard reading, collision management, and route choice, but it lives close to shallow breadth because many map variants can differ cosmetically while asking the same dodge-and-jump decisions. The core depth question is whether failure feels attributable and improvable under crowd chaos.
15 of 15 responses include lens metadata.

This sampled player sees strong short-session fit, with practical concern about interruptions, controls, and free-to-play fairness.
I would download this for short breaks because the premise looks obvious in a few seconds: run, dodge, survive, repeat. It seems like a good low-commitment game when I am waiting somewhere, as long as matches start fast and do not bury me in menus. I am cautious about free-to-play competition because I do not want paid boosts or too many pop-ups interrupting quick sessions. The obstacle layouts look readable and touch-friendly enough that I could probably play without thinking too hard.
This sampled player sees strong short-session fit, with practical concern about interruptions, controls, and free-to-play fairness.I like that the goal looks immediate and the rounds seem short.
I worry pop-ups or paid advantages could get in the way of quick play.
The course obstacles look clear enough for fast tap-and-swipe play.
I would download it if I wanted something light with cute costumes, but it is not my ideal cozy game. The characters look playful and collectible, so I can imagine enjoying outfits or seasonal rewards after a stressful day. My worry is that the main loop looks loud and competitive instead of comforting, and free-to-play cosmetics can get pushy. The colorful arenas are appealing, but I would need the shop and rewards to feel friendly rather than like constant pressure.
This sampled player finds some appeal in character expression but has a weaker fit with loud competition and recurring purchase pressure.I like the playful characters and the possibility of fun cosmetics.
I worry the competitive chaos and cosmetic pressure could make it less relaxing.
The bright costumes and arenas look cheerful, but not especially calm.
I might download it, but more as a quick curiosity than because it feels original. The silly obstacle races look polished and easy to jump into, which is good for killing time. At the same time, it gives me a strong familiar party-platformer vibe, so I would be looking for personality, strange maps, or funny surprises to keep me around. The bright characters and simple course layouts help the first session look clear, but I am not sure the game has enough weirdness for me beyond that.
This sampled player is open to a quick install but discounts the game for feeling familiar unless the play reveals memorable variety.I like that it looks polished and easy to start.
I worry it may feel too familiar without enough personality.
The bright courses look simple to read but not especially surprising.
I would download it to test the competition, but I would not assume I will stick with it for long. The obstacle-course rounds look fast and readable, so winning or losing seems like it would be easy to understand right away. What worries me is the free-to-play setup, because cosmetics or passes could make the grind feel more important than actually getting better. The bright arenas and chunky characters make it look easy to track the action, which matters if I am trying to play cleanly instead of just button-mashing.
This sampled player sees a strong quick-competition fit but remains skeptical about depth, fairness, and purchase pressure.I like that the rounds look quick, competitive, and easy to read.
I worry the free-to-play loop could push cosmetics or passes harder than skill.
The bright obstacle courses look clear enough for fast reactions.
I would probably download it because it looks like the kind of game people can understand instantly and joke about after one round. The huge download count makes it feel like there will actually be other players around, which helps for a party game. I like that the store art shows crowded, silly obstacle courses instead of a slow tutorial-heavy game. My hesitation is that it may be fun for a bus ride or a few friend matches, but not something I would keep if the events or shop start feeling noisy.
This sampled player responds to social proof, immediate clarity, and short-session humor, with concern about long-term novelty and clutter.I like that it looks instantly understandable and social.
I worry it may become noisy or repetitive after the first few sessions.
The crowded obstacle-course scenes make the chaos look easy to grasp.

This sampled player finds a narrow social use case but weak personal fit due to limited planning, stress, and recurring purchase concerns.
I would only download it if a family member wanted to play together, not for my own regular game. I like light strategy and simple choices, and this looks more like quick reactions than gentle planning. The large player base suggests there would be people to play with, but I would rather have a clear one-time purchase than a stream of cosmetics or passes. The bright courses are easy to recognize, yet the game does not look calm enough for the kind of low-stress progress I enjoy.
This sampled player finds a narrow social use case but weak personal fit due to limited planning, stress, and recurring purchase concerns.I like that it appears popular enough for social play.
I dislike that it looks more reactive than thoughtfully strategic.
The bright courses are recognizable, but the action looks too busy for calm planning.
I would probably not install it, even on a tablet. The characters and colors are cheerful, but the game looks fast and crowded, and I prefer something I can sit with comfortably. I would worry about small moving targets, quick timing, and menus or purchases interrupting the flow. The wide action scenes look polished, but they do not give me the calm, larger-button feeling I look for.
This sampled player values comfortable tablet play and readability, making the fast crowded action a weak fit despite cheerful visuals.I like the cheerful colors and friendly-looking characters.
I dislike the fast pace and the possibility of small, stressful interactions.
The scenes look polished but too crowded for comfortable tablet play.
I would probably skip this one. It looks lively, but I prefer games that feel calm, clear, and not too pushy about purchases. A free-to-play action game makes me wonder about ads, passes, or offers getting in the way, and I would rather pay clearly for a peaceful game if I like it. The colorful screens show a lot happening at once, which makes me think it may feel cluttered rather than relaxing.
This sampled player has low trust and comfort fit due to fast action, busy presentation, and unclear purchase pressure.I like that the game looks colorful and popular.
I dislike the possibility of ads, offers, or subscriptions interrupting a simple game.
The bright action looks crowded and not especially restful.
I would not download it for my usual daily play. I like games where the rules are steady and I can think through a level, and this looks more like quick reflex racing against many other people. The idea is easy enough to understand, but I would worry about losing because of speed or controls rather than a choice I made. The landscape action looks bright and clear in places, yet it does not look like the calm puzzle routine I would come back to.
This sampled player finds the rules understandable but the reflex-heavy competition poorly matched to daily puzzle motivations.I like that the basic idea appears easy to understand.
I dislike that success seems tied to fast reactions rather than calm problem solving.
The bright landscape scenes are clear, but the crowded racing looks stressful.
I would skip this because it does not look like the kind of rule-based game I enjoy. I prefer cards, tiles, or boards where I can see the layout and make a clear move, while this seems focused on running through obstacles under pressure. I also do not like the idea of watching ads or spending to recover from mistakes in a fast game. The course images are colorful, but the objectives look too hectic for me to follow comfortably.
This sampled player has poor fit because the game lacks familiar turn-based structure and may feel pressured or ad-driven.I like that the game looks colorful and straightforward for players who enjoy racing.
I dislike that it appears rushed and far from the slower rule-based games I prefer.
The colorful courses look hectic rather than neatly organized.

This sampled player has low fit because the game emphasizes action and cosmetics more than calm, readable daily problem solving.
I would not be very likely to download it for my own routine. I usually want something calmer with a clear daily challenge, and this looks more like frantic multiplayer races than a relaxing puzzle break. The colorful outfits and characters are fun, so I understand why people might enjoy collecting or customizing them. Still, the fast arenas and crowd chaos make it look too loud for the kind of steady progress I come back to every day.
This sampled player has low fit because the game emphasizes action and cosmetics more than calm, readable daily problem solving.I like the cheerful characters and customization potential.
I dislike that the core play looks too frantic for a calm daily routine.
The bright graphics are appealing, but the scenes look busier than I prefer.
I might download it if my kids were playing, but I would not choose it first for myself. The rounds look short, which is good when I may need to stop suddenly, and the premise is clear enough without much explanation. My concern is that fast competitive games can turn into constant events, rewards, and shop prompts, which is exactly the kind of noise I do not want in a spare ten minutes. The store images make the action look crowded and lively, but also a little hectic for interrupted play.
This sampled player sees some family and short-round value but worries about interruption, clutter, and demanding live-service pacing.I like that the rounds seem short and easy to understand.
I worry the game could pile on events, rewards, and shop prompts when I just want a quick break.
The crowded obstacle scenes look fun but hectic.
I would be hesitant to download it because free-to-play party games often end up asking for attention and money in small pieces. The game looks polished enough that I might try it once, especially since the huge player base suggests it is not a throwaway app. What would decide it for me is whether purchases are cosmetic and fair, not a maze of passes, timers, and daily claims. The bright race scenes look simple to understand, but I do not want a game that turns every short session into a store visit.
This sampled player is open to polished entertainment but strongly conditions download intent on transparent, optional monetization.I like that it looks polished and widely played.
I worry about passes, daily pressure, and repeated store prompts.
The race scenes look clear and energetic, but they also hint at a busy live-service loop.
I would download it if I had a friend or family group to compare runs with. The obstacle races look like they could create funny wins and losses without needing a long learning curve. I would be less interested if competition is mostly about grinding rewards or buying the latest pass instead of playing better. The colorful courses make the action look clear enough for friendly rivalry, and the large audience suggests matchmaking should be active.
This sampled player has a stronger fit due to friendly competition and clear goals, with concern about fairness and recurring pass pressure.I like that it looks built for quick, funny competition with other people.
I worry that rewards or passes could matter more than fair play.
The colorful courses look readable enough for casual rivalry.
I would probably skip this unless someone in my family wanted to play it with me. It looks polished and energetic, but the appeal seems more about quick chaos than meaningful choices or planning. I can see the obstacle courses being fun for a few minutes, yet I would get frustrated if the free-to-play parts add pop-ups, ads, or currencies between rounds. The bright action is easy to understand, but it does not look like the kind of game I would settle into after work.
This sampled player values meaningful decisions and time respect, and the game appears too chaotic and potentially interruption-heavy for that routine.I like that the game looks polished and easy to understand quickly.
I dislike that it seems light on strategy and possibly heavy on free-to-play interruptions.
The colorful arenas look energetic, but the screen feels busy for winding down.