Visual Assets
8 screenshotsStore Profile
Identity
- Publisher
- WISENESS GAME ONLINE INTERNATIONAL LTD
- iOS app ID
- 6756989323
Market Signals
- US top grossing
- 36
- US top free
- 84
Loading lower dossier sections.

| iOS app ID | 6756989323 |
|---|---|
| ios bundle id | com.phs.global.ios |
| ios title | Last Asylum: Plague |
| Publisher | WISENESS GAME ONLINE INTERNATIONAL LTD |
| downloads bucket | 10M+ |
| store category | Strategy |
| content rating | 12+ |
| ios version | 1.0.38 |
| ios current version release date | 2026-05-30 |
| ios rating average | 4.8 |
| ios rating count | 23354 |
| ios price | 0 |
| ios size mb | 851.6 |
| US top free | 84 |
| US top grossing | 36 |
| ios us top grossing rank | 92 |
Loading lower dossier sections.
No exact-game UA creatives found.
The visible loop is survival-base resource management: move a hero/doctor through an asylum or compound, gather resources, unlock rooms, treat survivors, upgrade treatments or defenses, and survive waves or boss threats. Evidence suggests a strategy wrapper, but the screenshots emphasize ad-style playable actions more than full 4X strategy.
The strongest uncertainty is whether the visible ad-like actions form one survival strategy loop or several disconnected chores. Prototype priority pressure across treatment, room unlocks, resources, and combat before building the full base layer.
The game has plausible survival-strategy depth if treatment, room unlocks, resources, and combat create one priority problem. The risk is that visible ad-style actions become disconnected chores: heal here, unlock there, fight elsewhere, without shared pressure.
15 of 15 responses include lens metadata.
No segment scores in this group yet.

Trust and low-pressure monetization are decisive; the free-to-play strategy format and crowded presentation create strong hesitation.
I would not download this unless I had strong reassurance that the ads and purchases were gentle. I am willing to pay for a peaceful game, but free survival strategy games often make me suspicious of subscriptions, pop-ups, and pressure to keep up with other players. The social side could be nice if it were friendly, yet I would not want guild obligations or constant reminders. The store images look crowded with bases and battles, which makes me worry the menus would feel like work.
Trust and low-pressure monetization are decisive; the free-to-play strategy format and crowded presentation create strong hesitation.I like that there may be a social group aspect if it stays friendly and optional.
I dislike the possibility of pop-ups, subscriptions, and pressure to keep up.
The crowded base and battle scenes make the game look like it could have too many menus.
I would probably not download this, even though I do enjoy light planning games. This looks more like a fast, competitive survival war game than a gentle strategy game where I can think at my own pace. Daily pressure, battle passes, or constant events would make it feel like an obligation instead of a relaxing pastime. The visuals are dramatic and bright, but the battle scenes look too intense for the kind of simple planning I prefer.
The sample likes strategy, but the apparent intensity, competitive framing, and potential daily pressure conflict with calm planning needs.I like that there may be planning and resource choices underneath the survival theme.
I dislike that it looks intense and possibly tied to daily pressure.
The bright battle scenes look dramatic but not calming.
I would skip this because it does not look close enough to the card, board, or word games I usually enjoy. I like clear rules that I can understand right away, and a survival strategy game with armies and bases feels like it may take too much learning. The world may be interesting, but I would rather explore something with a simpler layout and fewer moving parts. The store images show detailed battle scenes, yet they do not give me the familiar tabletop feeling I look for.
Familiar rule structures and readable layouts are missing, so the survival strategy presentation creates more friction than appeal.I like that the game appears to have a large world to explore.
I dislike that the rules and objectives do not look familiar enough for me.
The images show detailed battles rather than a clear board-like layout.
I would not download it for tablet play because it looks too busy and combative for a comfortable evening game. I want large buttons, calm pacing, and screens I can read without studying every corner. This looks like it may require quick reactions to events or constant checking, which is not what I want when I sit down to relax. The wide scenes might look good on a tablet, but the amount of action and small details would probably tire me out.
Comfort, readability, and calm pacing are decisive; the game’s dense survival-war presentation does not fit this sample’s tablet use.I like that the wide presentation might display well on a larger screen.
I dislike that it looks too active and visually crowded for relaxed tablet play.
The scenes have many small details and effects that could become tiring.
I would skip this because it does not look like a calm daily game I could use to unwind. I prefer clear puzzles or simple goals, and this seems more about survival battles, upgrades, and keeping up with a larger system. If it had a very gentle guided mode, I might reconsider, but that is not what the store presentation suggests. The cinematic scenes look polished, though I would rather have a quieter screen with obvious next steps.
The sample seeks calm daily repetition, while the game appears larger, darker, and more management-heavy than desired.I like that the presentation looks polished and cinematic.
I dislike that the game seems too intense for a quiet daily routine.
The polished scenes are impressive, but they do not look peaceful or simple.

The game has strong survival strategy appeal and broad social proof, but this sample is quick to churn if the first session feels generic or grind-heavy.
I might download this for one try, mostly because the survival strategy setup looks easy to understand and the store popularity makes it feel less random. It seems like the kind of game I could open while half-relaxing, build something up, and see if the base progression grabs me. My worry is that it may turn into a heavy alliance grind or a lot of upgrade timers before it feels fun. The landscape battle and base scenes look polished enough for a first install, but I am not sure it looks fresh enough that my friends would care about it.
The game has strong survival strategy appeal and broad social proof, but this sample is quick to churn if the first session feels generic or grind-heavy.I like that it looks polished and already has a big player base.
I worry it will become a timer-heavy grind without much personality.
The wide battle and base views make it look playable on a phone held sideways.
I would probably skip downloading it unless a friend was already playing. The survival strategy loop looks like it could be social, but it also seems too involved for the quick sessions I usually want while waiting around. I do not mind ads in a casual game if they are optional, but this kind of free strategy game makes me expect interruptions or timers. The screenshots show a lot happening on the screen, so I would worry about figuring out my next move quickly.
This sample needs low-commitment sessions, and the game appears more demanding than a quick social snack unless friends create a reason to join.I like the possibility of teaming up or comparing progress with other players.
I do not like that it looks too busy for quick, pause-friendly sessions.
The crowded strategy scenes make me think I would need more focus than I usually have on the go.
I would be hesitant to install this because it looks competent but not very surprising. I like games where I can learn a system and feel myself getting better, and survival strategy can do that if the choices are real. My concern is that this may be more about waiting, upgrading, and following the same path as every other base-builder. The store images look readable and high production, but they do not show a hook that makes me think this one is different.
The sample values originality and mastery; visible polish helps but does not overcome concern that the gameplay may be conventional.I like that the game looks clean enough to understand at a glance.
I dislike that the store presentation does not make the main idea feel fresh.
The images look readable, but the scenes feel familiar for this genre.
I would probably not download this unless I knew the combat was actually fair and competitive. The survival strategy angle can be fun if planning and timing matter, but these games often end up rewarding whoever pays or logs in the most. I am also wary of free-to-play games that bury the real fight under upgrade menus and bundles. The store visuals look packed with units, bases, and effects, which makes it look deep but also like it could be menu-heavy fast.
Competitive motivation is present, but suspicion of pay-to-win progression and cluttered free-to-play systems lowers install intent.I like the possibility of large-scale strategy fights with real planning.
I worry that winning could depend more on spending and grind than skill.
The dense battle and base screens make the game look deep but potentially cluttered.
I would skip this for myself because it looks more intense than comforting. I like collecting and coming back to something that feels cozy or expressive, and this seems focused on plague survival, battles, and base pressure. There may be events or characters to chase, but I do not see enough warmth or customization to make me want it after a long day. The art is bright and polished in places, but the overall mood feels harsh rather than relaxing.
The game’s survival strategy theme conflicts with this sample’s preference for cozy collection and low-pressure return value.I like that the game has polished art and seems to have event-driven energy.
I dislike that the mood feels stressful instead of cozy or expressive.
The bright effects do not change that the scenes feel harsh and battle-focused.

This sample’s routine puzzle preference does not align strongly with survival strategy, and the visual complexity raises concern about relaxation and clarity.
I would probably skip this because it does not look like the kind of calm daily challenge I usually keep. I like clear levels and steady improvement, and a survival strategy game may have too many systems before I get to the satisfying part. If the objectives are simple and the battles are more planning than pressure, I could be surprised, but the store page does not make that clear. The screenshots look polished, yet the maps and battle scenes feel busier than the puzzle-style routine I prefer.
This sample’s routine puzzle preference does not align strongly with survival strategy, and the visual complexity raises concern about relaxation and clarity.I like the possibility of clear progress if the game gives manageable goals.
I dislike that it appears busier than the calm level-based games I usually play.
The store images have polish, but the maps and fights look crowded for a relaxing routine.
I might download it, but only cautiously, because it looks polished enough that the strategy systems could be worth learning. I do not mind paying in a free game if the value is clear, but survival strategy games often hide the real cost behind speedups and power gaps. I would be looking for meaningful choices, not just a loop of upgrading buildings and waiting. The large-scale base and combat images make it look substantial, but they also make me wonder whether the text and menus will stay readable.
The sample has spending tolerance and strategy interest, but needs trust, readability, and clear value before committing.I like that the game looks substantial and potentially strategic.
I worry about hidden costs, speedups, and unclear value in the free-to-play structure.
The wide scenes look impressive, but I would want the menus and text to stay readable.
I would consider downloading it if there are fair alliances, rankings, or events where I can compare progress with other players. The survival strategy format can be fun when goals are clear and competition is not just about who spends more. For short waiting-room sessions, though, I am not sure this would be quick enough to enjoy without getting pulled into chores. The store visuals show big battles and bases, which makes the competition look active, but also a little dense for casual check-ins.
Social competition creates interest, while concerns about fairness, time commitment, and dense presentation keep intent moderate.I like the possibility of active competition and comparing progress with others.
I dislike the chance that competition could become spending-driven or time-consuming.
The battle-heavy images make the game look active, but the screens feel dense for quick checks.
I would be willing to try this because strategy management is the part of mobile gaming that can hold my attention. If the game gives me meaningful base choices, resource tradeoffs, and readable objectives, it could fit an evening session well. My concern is the free-to-play pacing, especially if ads, speedups, or event pressure interrupt the planning. The screenshots show a lot of systems and large maps, which makes it look deep, but I would need the interface to guide me clearly.
This sample is the strongest fit among mid-life variants because the game’s strategy management aligns with their goals, though monetization and clarity remain concerns.I like the promise of base management, upgrades, and strategic resource choices.
I worry that ads or speedups could interrupt the planning loop.
The maps and system-heavy scenes make the game look deep, provided the interface stays clear.
I would not be in a hurry to download this because it looks like a game that wants regular attention. I can enjoy strategy, but I need something I can pause and resume around family and work without feeling punished. The free-to-play setup makes me wonder whether I will be pushed toward passes, subscriptions, or daily pressure before I know if I like it. The store images look polished, but the busy war-survival scenes do not make it feel like a low-stress evening game.
Time respect is the main issue; polished presentation helps, but the implied schedule pressure and free-to-play model reduce fit.I like that it looks like a full-featured strategy game rather than a throwaway app.
I dislike that it seems likely to demand daily attention and purchases.
The war and base screens look polished but too busy for a calm short session.