Visual Assets
8 screenshotsStore Profile
Identity
- Publisher
- OnBudget Games
Market Signals
- US top grossing
- 43
- US top free
- 10
- Downloads
- 140K
- Rating
- 4.54
Loading lower dossier sections.

| platform identifier | com.ysqyom.asgp |
|---|---|
| Store title | Land of Arielia |
| Publisher | OnBudget Games |
| version | 1.4 |
| rating average | 4.54 |
| rating display | 4.54 |
| rating count | 4176 |
| downloads bucket | 100K+ |
| store category | Role Playing |
| content rating | Everyone |
| paid | false |
| price | Free |
| updated on | 2026-06-02 |
| whats new | {"notes":[],"version":"1.4"} |
| contains ads | false |
| in app purchases | true |
| android us top new free rank | 39 |
| US top free | 10 |
| US top grossing | 43 |
| Download estimate | 140K |
Loading lower dossier sections.
No exact-game UA creatives found.
Land of Arielia appears to sell an idle open-world creature RPG loop: explore a fantasy zone, encounter or hatch companions, grow the party, and push into broader areas.
The core opportunity is a creature-collection idle exploration RPG, but the biggest uncertainty is whether the apparent open-world fantasy converts into a repeatable, understandable player decision loop rather than passive spectacle plus collection.
Land of Arielia has meaningful depth potential if exploration routes, companion traits, egg rarity, and zone gates interact, but the visible evidence mostly shows spectacle and collection breadth rather than pressured non-redundant decisions.
15 of 15 responses include lens metadata.

This sample is pulled by social proof and possible event-driven hype but needs fast excitement and fair progression.
I would probably download it if I saw a friend playing, but the store page alone only half sells me. The rating and recent downloads make it look like there is some buzz, and fantasy RPGs can be fun when there are pulls, events, and characters people compare. My concern is that it could be another free RPG where progress slows unless you pay, which makes the hype fade fast. The landscape gameplay images make it look more like a sit-down mobile game than a one-tap puzzle, so I would need the first session to show something exciting quickly.
This sample is pulled by social proof and possible event-driven hype but needs fast excitement and fair progression.I like that the rating and downloads suggest other players are finding something worth trying.
I worry that progress or strong characters may be tied too heavily to spending.
The landscape RPG images make it look more involved than a casual puzzle game, which raises the bar for the opening session.
I might try Land of Arielia if I wanted a fantasy escape, but it is not an instant download for me. The bright character art and RPG setting could be comforting if there are heroes to collect, outfits, or gentle daily rewards. I would be worried about ads or purchase pressure interrupting the cozy part, especially since it is free with in-app purchases. The store art looks colorful and busy in a classic mobile RPG way, which is appealing for fantasy mood but makes me unsure whether the game will feel relaxing after a long day.
This sample responds to fantasy mood and collection potential but is cautious about pressure, clutter, and interruptions.I like the colorful fantasy mood and the possibility of collecting characters or rewards.
I worry the free model could bring ads, pressure, or grind that makes it less relaxing.
The art looks bright and classic for a mobile RPG, but also a little busy for calm play.
I would download it out of curiosity, but I would not expect it to feel very fresh right away. The fantasy RPG setup could be fun if the progression has clever builds or hard levels to beat, and the rating gives me some confidence that players are sticking with it. My main concern is free-to-play balance, because RPGs can hide a lot of grind behind upgrades. The visuals look polished enough, but the store presentation does not instantly show me a weird hook or standout idea, so the first hour would have to prove itself.
This sample is open to RPG progression and challenge but needs originality and fair advancement to avoid quick churn.I like the possibility of builds, levels, and progression to master.
I worry it may lean on familiar fantasy RPG grinding without a fresh reason to stay.
The visuals seem polished, but they do not immediately show a distinctive hook.
I would probably try Land of Arielia, but I would go in skeptical. A fantasy RPG with a strong rating and a decent number of downloads makes it feel like there may be enough challenge and progression to test, not just a throwaway clone. My worry is that a free RPG with purchases can easily turn into power gaps or grind walls, which kills the fun if winning depends more on spending than playing well. The landscape battle-looking images make it seem more involved than a quick tap game, so controls and combat clarity would decide whether I keep it after the first session.
This sample is drawn toward mastery and fantasy progression but has a strong fairness concern around free RPG spending and control quality.I like that it looks like a real fantasy RPG with enough popularity to suggest there is substance behind it.
I am wary of upgrade pressure or power advantages tied to purchases.
The landscape action presentation makes me expect more involved combat, so readability and controls matter a lot.
I would be hesitant to download this for my normal short sessions. The rating and download count make it look trustworthy enough, but a fantasy RPG usually means menus, quests, and setup before the fun starts. I would be more interested if it clearly showed fast objectives or something I could do in a few minutes with friends or guilds. The store images look busy enough that I am not sure I could understand what to tap during a commute, so I would probably wait unless a friend recommended it.
This sample values quick, clear sessions and social reasons to return; the game has trust signals but not enough evidence of low-friction play.I like that the rating and download activity make it feel less risky to try.
I worry the RPG loop may be too slow or menu-heavy for short breaks.
The store images look like there may be a lot happening on screen, which makes quick play less obvious.

This sample is highly trust-focused and unlikely to accept daily pressure, competitive framing, or unclear monetization.
I would not download it unless I knew the purchases and daily obligations were very restrained. The rating is encouraging, but free fantasy games often come with passes, timed rewards, and reminders that make them feel less peaceful. I am not looking for fast competition or pressure; I want something I can enjoy without being pushed. The visuals look cinematic enough to be attractive, but that does not overcome my concern about clutter and ongoing payment prompts.
This sample is highly trust-focused and unlikely to accept daily pressure, competitive framing, or unclear monetization.I like that the game appears polished and has a reassuring rating.
I worry about passes, daily pressure, and purchase prompts disrupting a peaceful game.
The cinematic fantasy look is attractive, but it also suggests a more intense game than I want.
I would probably skip this because I usually prefer games with familiar rules, like cards, boards, or word layouts. Land of Arielia may be a well-liked RPG, and the rating does make it seem reputable, but I do not immediately understand what I would be doing turn to turn. If it had simple tactical battles with clear pieces and readable choices, I might reconsider. The store images look more like a fantasy adventure with a cinematic interface than a board-like game I could learn at a glance.
This sample needs familiar rule structures and immediate clarity; the RPG presentation feels less accessible despite strong reputation.I like that the rating gives the game some trust and suggests players are satisfied.
I dislike that I cannot quickly see familiar rules or a simple turn-by-turn structure.
The images look cinematic and adventurous rather than like a clear board or card layout.
I might try it only if the strategy is slow and clear. A fantasy RPG can be satisfying when I can plan upgrades and make simple choices, and the rating makes it seem worth a cautious look. My worry is that it may be grindy or require too much tapping during short spare moments, especially if ads are used to continue or speed things up. The store presentation looks more dramatic than gentle, so I would need a very understandable opening before I stayed.
This sample is open to gentle planning but concerned about grind, time pressure, and ad-driven interruptions.I like the possibility of simple upgrade choices and gradual planning.
I worry it could be too grindy, too busy, or interrupted by ad-based continues.
The store images feel dramatic rather than gentle, so the opening would need to explain itself clearly.
I would probably not download this for tablet play unless I saw that it had very clear controls. The fantasy world could be enjoyable to explore, and the good rating makes it seem legitimate, but RPG screens often have small buttons and many icons. I prefer a calmer game where I can tap through at my own pace without worrying about missing something. The store images look colorful, but also busy enough that I am unsure it would be comfortable to sit with for longer sessions.
This sample values comfort, readable controls, and calm pacing; the RPG appeal is limited by possible visual density.I like the idea of exploring a fantasy world if it is calm and easy to control.
I worry about small buttons, too many icons, and pressure to keep up.
The colorful store images also look busy, which makes tablet comfort uncertain.
I would likely skip Land of Arielia because it does not look like the kind of daily puzzle routine I usually enjoy. The high rating is a good sign, but a fantasy RPG sounds like more rules, upgrades, and attention than I want for a calm session. I would rather pay once for a clear game with simple levels than sort through free-to-play purchases. The store images look more like action and adventure than a relaxed puzzle board, so I do not think it fits my usual play style.
This sample prioritizes clear daily problem solving and transparent payment, making the RPG format a poor fit despite positive store trust.I like that the rating suggests many players are satisfied with it.
I dislike the likelihood of extra rules, upgrades, and free-to-play purchases for my daily routine.
The images suggest adventure and action rather than a calm board or puzzle layout.

This sample needs social comparison and fair competition; the game has credibility but unclear multiplayer or event appeal.
I would give it a try if it has guilds, rankings, or events where progress feels fair to compare. The rating and downloads make it look like there is an active audience, which matters for a social RPG. I am less interested if it is only solo grinding through a fantasy world with paid shortcuts. The store visuals suggest a polished adventure, but they do not clearly show the social or competitive side I would need to stay engaged.
This sample needs social comparison and fair competition; the game has credibility but unclear multiplayer or event appeal.I like that the downloads and rating suggest enough players may be around for events or comparison.
I am unsure whether the game has fair social competition or just solo progression.
The visuals show a polished fantasy adventure, but not clearly the kind of player comparison I would want.
I would not rush to download it because I prefer knowing exactly what I am paying for. The rating is reassuring, and the fantasy production looks decent, but free RPGs with in-app purchases often become a stream of packs, passes, and upgrade offers. I would be more comfortable with a clear one-time purchase or a straightforward ad-free option. The landscape battle presentation looks like a real game rather than a tiny casual app, but I would need the controls and purchase offers to feel honest before I stayed.
This sample values polish but is cautious about free RPG monetization and wants transparent value before committing.I like that it appears polished and has a strong enough rating to seem credible.
I dislike not knowing whether purchases will be fair, optional, and easy to understand.
The landscape gameplay makes it look substantial, but also like controls and offers could become a lot to manage.
I would probably skip this one for my usual daily routine. It may be a good RPG, and the rating says people like it, but I tend to come back to games with calmer, clearer daily goals rather than a busy fantasy progression loop. I would worry about ads, pop-ups, or too many currencies getting between me and a relaxing session. The store images look more cluttered and action-heavy than the puzzle-style play I normally unwind with.
This sample prefers calm, readable routine play and sees the RPG as potentially too busy and monetized for that purpose.I like that the strong rating suggests it may be well received by RPG players.
I worry about clutter, ads, and too much progression management for a relaxing daily game.
The store images look busier and more action-focused than the calm layout I usually prefer.
I would probably skip it unless I knew the sessions were easy to pause. The fantasy RPG setting could be enjoyable, and the rating gives it some credibility, but I do not have patience for a game that needs constant attention or piles of menus. If there are simple goals, auto-battles, or short quests, I could see it fitting a break after work. The screenshots look like a lot is happening at once, so I would worry about clutter and interruptions more than the theme itself.
This sample needs interruption-friendly play and clear goals; the RPG appeal is outweighed by possible clutter and time demand.I like that the fantasy theme could offer steady progress when I have time.
I worry the game may demand too much attention or feel cluttered during short sessions.
The store images look busy enough that I question how simple the next objective will be.
I would consider downloading Land of Arielia, mainly because a fantasy RPG can give me upgrades and decisions to work through over time. The rating and recent download activity make it seem more reliable than a random new free game. I would want the strategy to come from party choices and progression, not just fast reactions or paid boosts. The store images look polished but fairly dense, so I would need clear menus and readable upgrade paths before I spent money or much time on it.
This sample sees potential in RPG planning but is sensitive to readability, fairness, and whether choices are meaningful.I like the promise of fantasy progression and decisions that build over several sessions.
I am cautious about paid boosts or unclear upgrade systems replacing real strategy.
The store images look polished, but the amount of information on screen makes clarity important.